1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 29, 2012, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on June 24, 2013 while serving as a radar operations soldier.

B. On November 5, 2013, the Plaintiff, while serving as a radar operator on August 11, 2012, due to frequent shift work and frequent shift work on November 9, 2012, caused a pain during his/her service on November 9, 2012, and thereby, caused a pain to the Defendant on November 12, 2012 (hereinafter “written application”).

) After diagnosis, on February 2013, he/she applied for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State or persons eligible for veteran’s compensation on the ground of the following reasons: (a) the neutism was diagnosed on February 2013; (b) the neutism was included in the neutism on March 2013; and (c) the neutism was not completely cured but was discharged from military service on June 24, 2013; and (d) the neutism was included in the radioactive and ne

C. On March 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was known to the Plaintiff as diversative disease, except in cases where it is possible to generate spine ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrates; (b) where spine ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrates are not verified to the extent of causing ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrates; and (c) medical opinions were presented to the effect that ebrate ebrates are accompanied by spine ebrates or are abnormal in spine ebrate ebrates; and (d) there are changes in ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrates; (b) records of special accounts on ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrate ebrates are confirmed; and (c) there is no specific and objective record to acknowledge that there was a causal causal relationship between the occurrence or aggravation.