Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around June 12, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on the front side of the “D” located in Osan-si, Sinsan-si, and was under the influence of alcohol. Around 23:51 on June 12, 2017, the Defendant asked the Defendant at his address to return home to the Defendant, “The Defendant was 15 years of age, and 15 years of age, she was able to look at the victim’s left side knee, and her head was her head on his/her hand.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 report processing.

2. On June 13, 2017, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 00:15, 2017, the police officers working in the Sungsung East Police Station E District located in Osan-si, Sinsan-si; (b) “Cinty flag”; and (c) “In 20 years,” and “in 20 years, the police officers were living in the Republic of Korea more than the width.”

While under the influence of alcohol, “I am in the monthly salary”, “I am in the Ethy,” and “I am in the Ethye of this weather, I am slickly or sleeped by very rough and disorderly words and conducts in the Ethye Police Station of the Sungsung East Police Station, which is a government office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to ctv and screen extractions), investigation reports (as to ctv screen recording);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), and the selection of fines for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a police officer in the course of performing official duties for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be deemed as assaulting a police officer on the ground of sentencing, but such a case may be mitigated. However, the fact that the defendant seems seriously reflects the fact that there is no record exceeding the fine,