logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.09.17 2015고단914
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2015. 6. 18. 01:15경 제주시 C에 있는 ‘D’ 식당 앞에서, 술에 취한 사람이 유리창을 두들기고 있다는 신고를 받고 출동한 제주동부경찰서 E지구대 소속 경찰관 경사 F으로부터 귀가할 것을 요구받자 “들어가든 말든 새끼야. 너나 똑바로 해.”라고 말하였다가 위 F으로부터 “공무집행방해죄와 모욕죄에 해당될 수 있습니다.”라는 말을 듣게 되자 화가 나, “너 한 번 해 보자. 개 씨발 놈이. 진짜.”라고 욕설을 하며, 손으로 위 F의 가슴과 얼굴 부위를 수회 밀치고, 발로 허벅지를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime prevention and suppression of F, who weared police uniforms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes in Chapter 1 of the video CD;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which prevents police officers from performing their duties on the ground of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, is a case where the nature of the crime in this case is heavy, and the direct tangible power is exercised, and thus, it is not appropriate to transfer the act's attitude. However, the defendant does not have a criminal record in addition to the punishment of a fine for another type of crime in 2000, it reflects the defendant's environment, the degree of the defendant's tangible power exercised, the form of the act and the manner of the act, and the balance with the sentencing case in the same case.

arrow