logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.10.22 2015고단926
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:00 on June 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) told F of the circumstances belonging to the Jeju Dong-dong Police Station E zone of the Jeju Police Station, which called “I would like to go to a close place to the patrol vehicle,” who called “I would like to go to the close place to the patrol vehicle.” However, I would like to hear the word “I would like to say I would like to read “I would not be able to go to the reporter and investigation because I are related to the report of illegal employment of the Singing machine. I would like to see I would like to read “I would not get to go to the close place to the patrol vehicle. I would like to see I would like to read “I would like to go to a close place to the patrol vehicle.” At the same time, I would like to write down F’s chest on the upper part of the vessel with both arms and shoulders, and f would see F in the upper part of the vessel.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties regarding F's crime prevention and suppression, which is a police officer, who wear the police uniform.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the crime of this case, which obstructs the performance of duties by police officers for the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order, is not easy, and the defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes in the past. However, this is relatively long long, and there is no record of punishment of minor fine in the 1990s, and since 1996, there is no record of punishment, and it reflects the recognition of and wrong for the crime, and other factors such as the environment of the defendant, the background and background of the crime, the degree of the type of the crime by the defendant, the form of the act by the defendant, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment is selected

arrow