The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., punishment of a fine of KRW 15,00,000), the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable, in light of the overall circumstances of this case.

(2) The Defendant asserted that the Defendant was guilty of facts or misapprehension of the legal principles in the statement of grounds for appeal, but the Defendant’s withdrawal was made on the first day of the trial of the court of first instance, and thus, it is not determined separately). 2. The Defendant’s confession of all the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake, and the Defendant’s primary crime without any previous conviction is recognized.

However, in full view of the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the crime related to illegal game farms promoted an excessive gambling spirit of the people and undermine sound labor practices, and thus is not eradicated despite continuous control, there is a need for strict punishment. The defendant's direct operation of the game of this case, and the fact that the nature of the crime is difficult to be deemed to be light in light of the size of business period and methods, etc., and all other factors of sentencing such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the defendant's assertion is unreasonable and inappropriate, which

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.