logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.09.03 2014노565 (1)
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반방조
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., punishment of a fine of four million won) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant reflects his mistake, seems to have reached the crime of this case with the aim of punishing living costs as part-time, and that the period of service as an employee in the game of this case is not long, and that the defendant's home form is not good.

However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by aiding and abetting and aiding and abetting the game machine installed in the game room by knowing the fact that the defendant would receive daily allowances and that he conducts speculative activities inside the game room. Since the game machine installed in the game room does not reach 80 times, the size of the place of business was reasonable, as the illegal game room equipped with CCTV, the defendant's liability to commit the crime of this case is not easy but the crime of aiding and abetting the defendant is not easy. The crime related to the illegal game room of this case requires strict punishment because it is highly large and continuous control of social harm, such as promoting the citizens' excessive speculative spirit and impairing the sound sense of work, and even before the crime of this case is committed, there is no reason to view that the defendant's punishment was imposed more than 1 million won on his employee as a crime of aiding and abetting the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, etc., even though he had been finally affirmed, and there was no reason to view the circumstances that the defendant committed the crime of this case before and after the crime of this case.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow