logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.15 2015고단238
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal experience] The Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution in July 3, 2013 at the Seoul Central District Court, which was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution due to the crime of interference with business, etc., and the judgment was finalized on July 11, 2013, and is still under suspension

【Criminal Facts】

At around 20:40 on January 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) called “D” restaurant in Jongno-gu Seoul, “D”; (b) and (c) received a report from F, who was sent by the President, while taking a bath, and was in motion to return to the Republic of Korea; (b) demanded F, to return to the Republic of Korea, the Defendant: (c) sent out of the restaurant; (d) “Im scop, internal buck, and scopbuck,” and sound “Im scop, scop, and scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scops; and (d) obstructed the performance of duties of F, such as taking off one-way scopic scopic scopic s and scopic s.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. G statements;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. The reasons for the sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act are the same criminal records as the defendant several times, and it is not good that the crime of this case is committed again during the suspension of execution due to obstruction of business and the nature of the defendant is not good.

However, the defendant has committed his criminal acts, has been committed for a long time after being detained in this case, and has been detained for a long time, has caused drinking to the crime of this case by drinking and contingently, and the defendant has supported his or her father and his or her children attending the second year of his or her high school and has been living alone.

1.2.1.

arrow