logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.08 2017나2021129
유언유효확인
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

The defendant's grounds for appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is admitted as legitimate even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows the materials submitted in this court.

Therefore, the reasons for the entry of this case are as follows: ① “Expert G” in the second sentence 20 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed as “Expert G of the court of first instance”; ② “this court” in the third sentence 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed as “Court of the court of first instance”; ③ “No. B” in the fourth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be dismissed as “No. 1, 2, 7, and 21 evidence” in the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance except that “No. 1, 2, and 7 through 21 evidence” in the fourth sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 42

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow