logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.08.19 2014나24091
소유권이전등기말소 등
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this court should explain are as follows: (a) in the first instance court’s judgment Nos. 4, 18, and 6 of the first instance court’s judgment, each addition is insufficient to admit the Defendants’ assertion to “each description of the evidence No. 13 through 21 and testimony of witness G of the party concerned” as evidence; and (b) No. 5, “the instant agreement” is the same as the reasoning of the first instance court’s judgment, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow