1. The defendant is based on the completion of repayment in 1957 with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 11 (including paper numbers) and all the arguments.

Pursuant to the former Farmland Reform Act (repealed by Act No. 4817, Jan. 1, 1996), the Defendant distributed 10 4 m2 from 19 to 1954 m2 from 1950 (short-term 4283) and 1954 m2 from 1954 to 1954 to the Plaintiff’s father B on the attached list (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. The net B completed the repayment of 2.08 2.08 1950 (short-term 4283), 0.54 1951 (short-term 4284), 0.56 0.56 1.7 1953 (short-term 4286), 1954 (short-term 4287), 0.12 0.6 1955 (short-term 4288), 2.7 2.73 1957 (short-term 4290), and 10.4 10.4

C. The Defendant completed registration of ownership preservation on October 23, 1957 regarding the instant land. D.

The deceased on September 7, 1980, and the deceased jointly inherited the deceased's property, E, F, G, and the deceased's children, who are their spouse, and as D died on July 19, 2004, the Plaintiff, E, F, and G were co-inheritors. On February 23, 2015, the Plaintiff, E, F, and G consulted on the division of inherited property by holding the instant land solely by the Plaintiff.

2. In a case where the farmland was distributed and repaid in accordance with the former Farmland Reform Act, the ownership of the farmland distributed is acquired by completing the repayment even if the registration was not completed (see Supreme Court Decision 92Da3381, Jan. 12, 1993). In full view of the above recognized facts, the net B acquired ownership of the land of this case as a result of the completion of the repayment in 1957, and the ownership was finally transferred to the Plaintiff according to the deceased’s death and the heir’s division agreement.

Therefore, the defendant is based on the plaintiff's completion of repayment in 1957 with respect to the land of this case.