Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On March 24, 2019, at around 17:10, the Defendant was boarding a taxi under the influence of alcohol prior to C in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul, and was urged by E, a police officer affiliated with the Seoul Bupyeong Police Station D police box, to embark on and return to another taxi after receiving a 112 report, the Defendant: (a) went from a taxi to walk off the right edge of E; (b) took off from the taxi; and (c) took her hand, she pushed off E with her two arms, she pushed off E, her police her, and her face on one hand.

The Defendant continued to catch F’s neck, which was called up with his hand, and assaulted F’s quality by cutting the strings to prevent the string, by cutting the strings to prevent the string, and by pushing F’s breast to the mouth of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Detailed photographs of the damaged police officer and scams of assault;

1. Status cards and photographs of victimized police officers, the detailed statement of handling the 112 Reporting Cases, and the service place of the D police box;

1. Investigation report (a specific place of occurrence and a summary of statements by witnesses);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (examination of moving pictures by police officers suffering damage);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is very serious to the content and degree of the Defendant’s obstruction of performance of official duties.

There were two police officers, and all people around the time have to witness this Chapter.

However, although the defendant was unable to memory in liquor at the time, he was investigated by the police station and did not immediately recognize his behavior and reflect his behavior.

Although the defendant has been sentenced to a fine for more than four times, the defendant has been sentenced to a fine.