A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around 20:50 on December 27, 2014, the Defendant assaulted the Defendant, such as the defect in arresting a flagrant offender due to the charge of assault against F by the D police box of the Seoul Yongsan-gu Police Station, which called the Defendant, on the front of the C polling station located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, on the front of the C polling station located in Yongsan-gu Seoul, and on the 112 report, that “the taxi driver paid money without paying the money.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing under the following) of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation] that there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the scope of the sentence] (the person who has been specially punished] (the decision of the sentence] (the decision of the sentence does not have the same criminal history, there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and other various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case, such as