Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

On January 28, 2014, around 22:00, the Defendant called the victim D (the age of 45) who had livedd with the former deniedr C at the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Blet parking lot as the crime of home destruction, and d's flab by hand, d's flab, flab, flab, and flab, and d's face by drinking.

As a result, the defendant put D with respect to about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to death diagnosis certificates and photographs of complainants;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Around January 23, 2014, the Defendant sent a text message to the mobile phone used by the former denied C (A. 45 years of age) with the content that “I will wait at the Dok-dong from the No. Dok-dong. I would like to wait for the attendance hours even at the A. Dok-in. I would have to see, even if the febbb will cause the death of the feb, the feb will stop in the first round.” In addition, the Defendant repeatedly sent a text message stating that “I will cause fear or apprehensions over 10 times in the same day, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Table.”

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Articles 74(1)3 and 44-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, Etc., and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s specifically manifested intent under Article 74(2) of the same Act. According to the records, the victim may have withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on March 6, 2014, which is after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the part against the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. among the facts charged in this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag.