The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Of the facts charged in the instant case.

Punishment of the crime

Attached Form

As stated in paragraph (3) of the facts charged.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement in court (a statement that there is any disturbance, such as entering the corridor of an apartment in which the victim resides several times as in the market, wearing labels and cutting off the door door to the front door);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (in addition to a report processing table, etc. 112), a criminal investigation report (Attachment to a detailed statement of handling cases), a criminal investigation report (any text sent and sent to a suspect and the victim and the details of Kakao Stockholm and correspondence

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Punishment of a fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended, and one hundred thousand won per day of detention in a workhouse;

1. Of the facts charged in the instant case, the part dismissing prosecution against the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (Defamation) and the violation of Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. for Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. among the facts charged in the instant case, is as shown in Articles 1 and 2 of the same Act.

This is a crime that falls under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. and Article 74(1)3 of the same Act and Article 44-7(1)3 of the same Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's will specifically manifested in accordance with Articles 70(3) and 74(2) of the same Act.

According to the statement in the letter of withdrawal of complaint submitted to this court, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, this part of the indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph