Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
Summary of Facts charged
1. On November 18, 2014, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc. (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection Act”), sent a message to the victim G using the FMessen, which is an internal administrative computer network of E viewing, at the D Office located in C around 08:04, using the FMessen, which is an internal administrative computer network of E viewing, and sent the message to the victim G. In addition, from that to August 17, 2016, the Defendant sent the message 43 times in total, as shown in attached Table 1, to reach the victim repeatedly via information and communications networks.
2. 협박의 점 피고인은 2016. 8. 11. 14:15경 H에 있는 I사무소에서 피해자 G이 E시청 감사담당관에게 피고인을 신고하여 징계처분을 받게 되었다는 이유로, F 메신저를 이용하여 피해자에게 “팜므털털 나 중징계란다 야 내가 이 쌍년아 너 찢어죽일거다 이런 말은 써줘야 내가 징계받아도 니가 회사 다니기 편하지 않을까 이쌍년 미친년아 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ”라는 내용의 메시지를 보내어 피해자를 협박한 것을 비롯하여, 그 때부터 2016. 8. 12.경까지 사이에 별지 범죄일람표 2 기재와 같이 총 6회에 걸쳐 메시지를 보내어 피해자를 각 협박하였다.
However, among the facts charged in this case, the crime falling under Articles 74(1)3 and 44-7(1)3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. is a crime falling under Article 74(2) of the same Act, and the crime of intimidation is a crime falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against each victim’s express intent under Article 283(3) of the same Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, the victim G has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant around November 17, 2016, which was the date of institution of the instant prosecution.