logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.07.20 2017고단2094
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 19, 2014.

From August 201, the Defendant tried to rent the studio building owned by the Defendant from around Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu to prepare the insufficient building fund for the rent deposit, but there is no person who intends to rent the studio building due to the establishment of the right to collateral security, the Defendant would pay part of the amount of the debt secured by the right to collateral security with the security deposit.

In order to conclude a lease contract with people who want to rent by false words, they concluded a lease contract and received a lease deposit.

around August 5, 2012, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement on the E office located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, on the victim F (the remaining age of 29 at the time) and the Defendant, and the I building 203 (the second class of the registration injury is 201 and 202) located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and the I building Ha are divided into two units, but in fact, there is 201 and 202 on the registry, and there was 203 and 204 on the registry, and there was 203 and 204 on the registry, and the victim entered into a contract with the victim on the lease agreement on the remainder of the lease deposit as of 202 on the registry (the second class of the registration injury is 201 and 202 on the registry). If the victim pays the remainder of the lease deposit to 100,000,000 I and 200 on the debt amount of 200,700.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, even if the Defendant received the lease deposit from the injured party, it was thought that it will be appropriated for the construction cost of the publicly notified party building, and even if the sale of other studio, etc. is delayed due to the real estate competition, it is not expected that the lease deposit is paid from the injured party because the other expected income is not.

arrow