logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2016.03.17 2015고단1192
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and by a fine not exceeding 2,00,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 20, 2014, the Defendant was determined to attach an electronic tracking device for five years at the Cheongju District Court’s Cheongju Branch.

1. No person subject to the attachment of an electronic device shall separate the electronic device from his/her body at his/her discretion, interfere with propagation, alter data received or otherwise impair its utility during the period of attachment of the electronic device, and the person subject to attachment shall charge, carry, or manage the electronic device so that the function of the electronic device can be maintained normally during the period of attachment of the electronic device;

A. From March 20, 2015 to 18:40 on March 20, 2015, the Defendant, from around 18:06, carried the “portable tracking device (a device to verify the location of an electronic device subject to attachment through satellite location verification system and mobile communication network)” out of the air, but did not carry the device and caused a escape warning from the scope of the attachment, thereby preventing the device from tracking normal location.

B. On April 12, 2015, the Defendant had to carry the “portable tracking device” from around 07:36 to 08:38, but maintained the utility of the electronic device by making the portable tracking device of the Defendant’s dwelling Gangseo-si C and 104, which is a residence of the Defendant, take a duty to care of the tax base of the tax base of the tax base of the local government, with a view to preventing ordinary tracking of the location by causing a escape warning to the scope of the attachment.

(c)

In May 28, 2015, the Defendant had to carry the “portable tracking device” from around 12:53 to 13:15 when going out, but had a portable tracking device carried out at the Defendant’s residence indicated in the foregoing paragraph (b), and had the device take place in the Defendant’s residence by going out of the place of residence with a view to preventing the Defendant from tracking the normal location of the device by going out of the place of residence with a view to getting the device out of the scope of compliance with the identification range of

(d)

On June 15, 2015, the Defendant issued an order to promptly charge a portable tracking device from the central control center around 18:00, but without good cause, is near the direction of Gangseo-si, Chungcheongnam-si.

arrow