beta
Text
The Defendants respectively disclose the summary of each judgment on Defendant A, B, C, and D.
Reasons
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that Defendant A is a foreigner of Syria nationality, who operates a motor vehicle parts wholesaler in the name of “(State)J” in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I, and Defendant B is a person who operates a motor vehicle part exporter in the trade name of “Seoul-si K Building in Gyeonggi-si and “The Resolution Committee L” in 505, and Defendant C and Defendant D are foreigners of Syria nationality, and Defendant A is a foreigner of Syria nationality who operates the motor vehicle parts exporter in the name of “N” in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
1. The defendant A or B shall not invite an alien by fraudulent means, such as making a false entry of the alien or providing false reference, or arrange such invitation in order to allow the alien to enter the Republic of Korea;
Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to make a false invitation by pretending to visit the foreigners of Syria nationality who are staying in the Republic of Korea and wanting to receive money, as if they were short-term visits for the importation of automobile parts with the (ju) L operated by Defendant B.
Defendant
A around November 21, 2012, at the above (State), at the LL office operated by Defendant B, the defendant B prepared and requested the invitation letter and identity guarantee to the defendant B, and the defendant B prepared and transmitted the invitation letter and identity guarantee to the defendant B, and the defendant B prepared a false letter of invitation stating that the (state) L, using the personal information of theO delivered by the defendant A, invited theO for the import of automobile parts and guaranteed their identity, and delivered it to theO through international mail, etc.
However, the Defendants knew that the O did not enter the Republic of Korea for the import transaction of automobile parts with L, and there was no intention for Defendant B to guarantee the identity of theO.
Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to do so and O on December 26, 2012.