logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.12 2016고정2582
출입국관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2.7 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.00,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person of Syria nationality who enters the status of stay (D-8-1) in 2003, and operates E, a corporation that engages in used vehicle export business, automobile trade business, or used vehicle parts trade business in Gyeongbuk-gun D.

F and G are Defendant A’s Chokh, Defendant B is Defendant A’s friendship, and H is Defendant A’s friendship.

1. No one shall invite a foreigner to enter the Republic of Korea by fraudulent means, such as a false statement of fact or a false fidelity guarantee, or apply for a visa or visa issuance certificate in order to allow the foreigner to enter the Republic of Korea;

Defendant

A around January 2013, upon Defendant A’s request that Defendant B, who is his wife, enter Korea, made Defendant B to make a false invitation, and Defendant B conspired to apply for a visa by certifying the false invitation letter, the reason for invitation, and the guarantee of identity guarantee to allow Defendant B and their women to enter Korea.

Defendant

A In fact, even though Defendant B was not a part of a motor vehicle, and there was no fact that Defendant B entered into a sales contract for a part of a motor vehicle with Defendant A, it is invited to Korea around January 25, 2013 in order for Defendant B to determine the purchase of a motor vehicle or part under a contract with Defendant B as a part of a motor vehicle.

“Preparation of a false invitation letter stating “”, notarized, sent it to Defendant B through international mail, and Defendant B filed an application for visa with an employee at the Embassy of Lebanon in the Republic of Korea, whose name is not known at the Embassy of Ethioba on February 12, 2013, while submitting a notarized false invitation letter.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to make a false entry by inviting foreigners to make a false entry by unlawful means, such as false entry of facts.

2. Defendant A

(a) Violation 1 of the Immigration Control Act) by false invitation to H;

arrow