logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.02.13 2016고단5787
위계공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 16, 2015, Defendant A, a foreigner of Egypt nationality, was involved in violent incidents at Egypt and was subject to tracking from police officers, Defendant A made a false invitation letter and personal identity guarantee to the effect that “(State) C representative D solicits A for a contract for the transaction of motor vehicles and parts and guarantees his/her identity” from a false invitation package with intent to escape from a police officer abroad on October 15, 2015 and with intent to know his/her name being active within Egypt, Defendant A entered the country to undergo an entry inspection by passing the entry inspection by a public official in charge of entry and departure management offices at the time of entry and departure according to the direction of Egypt, although the fact at the Incheon International Airport Review Office was not for a used vehicle export business on October 16, 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by immigration management offices in charge of entry inspection through fraudulent means.

2. The defendant B shall not invite a foreigner to enter the Republic of Korea by fraudulent means, such as a false statement of fact or a false fidelity guarantee, or arrange such invitation, and shall not apply any false statement of a visa or visa issuer, or arrange such an application.

Nevertheless, on April 26, 2016, the Defendant, in collusion with E (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) a foreigner of E Egypt nationality, received a copy of E’s passport of Egypt nationality foreign FF, G, H, and I, and received it from E, while knowing that the said foreigner was not an entry for a used vehicle export business, the Defendant is aware that the said foreigner was not an entry for a used vehicle export business.

arrow