A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:00 on July 16, 2020, the Defendant: (a) sought a talk that “E, while playing in a playground, she was forced to make his/her her son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son her son son son son her son son her son her son her son her

At around 17:10 on the same day, the Defendant discovered the victim E-(E) in front of the "Ulsanbuk-gu E-gu, Ulsan-gu, 29-13," and carried it into the same mine play facilities installed in the playground. On the other hand, the Defendant asked the victim, similar to the Defendant’s son, who was faced with, and caused the victim to have the son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son son, but the Defendant asked the victim, who was next to the Defendant, son son son son son son, son son son son son son son son son son son."

As a result, the defendant committed physical abuse against a child that may injure the child's body or injure the physical health and development of the child.

Summary of Evidence

1. To report the investigation of the police's statement to the defendant E in his/her court statement (video recordings of the victim E) and the application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 71 (1) 2 of the Child Welfare Act and Article 17 subparagraph 3 of the Child Welfare Act, the choice of punishment for an offense, and the choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 8 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Child Abuse Crimes;

1. The Defendant’s age, occupation, and environment, risk of repeating a crime, details and motive of the crime, the degree of disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant’s entrance due to the employment restriction order, and the prevention of child abuse and the protection of the victim, which may be achieved therefrom.