Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant A] The term “2016 Highest 61” (Defendant A) served as the Head of F University General Affairs Division (Grade V) located in B from May 11, 2011 to December 31, 2013, and is a public official in charge of duties, such as personnel, uniforms, benefits, welfare, conclusion of a goods contract, budget execution, construction and maintenance of facilities.

1. On August 13, 2011, the Defendant, from “H” located in G at G on August 23, 2011, employed D’s father as a contractual employee at F University-based contracting staff, made a solicitation to transfer the Defendant’s father’s father as a contractual employee at F University-based contracting staff, and issued cash KRW 10 million to accept a bribe.

2. From around 14:00 on September 1, 2012, the Defendant: (a) employed the Defendant’s incidental son to D as a contractual employee at F University fixed-term contracting staff; and (b) transferred a vacancy to a inorganic contract staff member at F University; (c) made a solicitation to recruit the Defendant as a technician; and (d) delivered a cash of KRW 5 million to accept a bribe.

From August 13, 2011 to September 1, 2012, the Defendants, “2016 Highest 569” (the Defendants) were married couple, and Defendant A, as his husband and wife, had expressed the victim D an aggregate of KRW 15 million in the name of the Defendants’ solicitation for employment as to his/her father I, and had the victim D pay money from the victims.

Defendant

B In the “K hotel” coffee shop located in the J of Sinpo City around September 16:30, 2013, B returned “15 million won” to the victim, even though the victim did not return it.

Even if the court considers it as a acceptance of bribe, the court will be punished.

Therefore, in order to not be subject to punishment, he/she would not employ son I as a inorganic contract position or make compensation for three years. If so, he/she would not so notify the newspaper reporters, public prosecutor's office, police station, the Ministry of Education, the Board of Audit and Inspection, the Board of Audit and Inspection, and the National Information Board, etc. and would be detained. On December 30, 2013, he/she called the victim again to the same effect.

Since then, Defendant B requested the victim D to compensate for three years.