(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.10.02 2013고단4526

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.10.02 2013고단4526

도로교통법위반(음주운전)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a passenger car by making a franchise.

1. On October 22, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.109% without a driver’s license, driven the said vehicle at a level of approximately approximately 50 meters from the front side of the Jinwon, which is located at the lower end of the city of Busan, to the front side of the same scoo apartment at the port of Busan, without a driver’s license.

2. The Defendant presented a driver’s license under the name of E in a vehicle that was requested to produce a driver’s license from D Inspector of the traffic safety department at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (1), and acted as if he were E, and exercised the above driver’s license unlawfully, which is an official document issued by the director of the Seoul Police Agency.

3. The Defendant, as described in the foregoing paragraph 2, committed the act of the foregoing paragraph 2 at the same time, time, and place as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph 2, and verified the personal information of the E entered into the police PDA and the fact of drunk driving, and subsequently forged E’s signature without authority to exercise his/her authority, and presented the forged E’s signature to D as if the signature of the E was genuine.

4. The Defendant, at the time and place stated in the above paragraph (1) above, submitted a report on the driver's statement of the driver's junish driver prepared by D (D) in the region belonging to the Busan High Police Station to recognize the result of the drinking test, and without authority, stated the driver's name in the column of the driver's name as "E" for the purpose of exercising the right, forged one copy of the driver's confirmation certificate in the name of E, which is a private document related to the certification of facts, and exercised it by issuing it to the above D as if the completion of the falsified document was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the statement of his/her oral statement (E name);

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control (E name);

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.30 2016고단5984

-서울북부지방법원 2014.12.23 2014고단3362

-부산지방법원 2013.07.03 2013고단527

-대구지방법원 안동지원 2015.04.28 2015고단90

-수원지방법원 2014.04.16 2013고단55