1. We affirm that the Defendant’s resolution on the delegation of Q Q Q ice adopted on September 26, 2010 is null and void.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs are the heads of the defendant churches belonging to the AP Labor Association, including the head of the defendant church, and the head of the office, etc., which are under the AP Labor Association under the AP Labor Association General Assembly of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the “General Assembly”), and Q is a person who, around October 2010, was appointed as the delegated pastor of the defendant church and was on the part of the head of the defendant church

B. On March 2010, the Defendant church organized the ice ice Committee to listen to the delegated pastor, and Q submitted a resume to the said ice Committee around that time. After which, Q was examined as a delegated pastor through a resolution of the Joint Council Resolution of September 26, 2010 of the Defendant church (hereinafter “instant resolution”), and the APNo Association adopted a resolution approving the ice ice ice of the delegated pastor to AP on October 24, 201, thereby taking office as a delegated pastor of the Defendant church.

C. Meanwhile, while submitting the resume to the Defendant church ice ice Committee, Q written the part of the work experience as “after the opening of the AP union in the AP et al. AP union in the AP et al. of the U.S. Cho Jae-gu from January 1, 1997 to March 2010, Q brought an action to nullify the delegation of the general assembly trial committee against the president of the APP union by asserting that “The above work experience is false and approved by the APP union by entering it as above shall be invalid,” and that the AP union president of the AP union filed a lawsuit to nullify the delegation of the general assembly trial committee.

The General Assembly Justice of Q falsely stated the experience of the above period (from around October 24, 201 to March 2008) and interfere with fair competition in the process of hearing, and the decision of the members of the ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ices and collected the advantages of the superior to other members of the Council who submitted the ice ice ice ice ices ice ice ice ice ice ice ices, and therefore, on August 12, 2013, A Q from the 79 Regular Labor Association (No. 201, Oct. 24, 201) to the Defendant church delegate ice ice Q is invalid. The judgment does not exceed