1. The plaintiff D's lawsuit of this case is dismissed.

2. All of the claims of the plaintiff A, B, and C are dismissed.

3. The costs of the lawsuit.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiffs A, B, and C are the heads of the defendant churches belonging to the E religious organization assembly (hereinafter “general assembly”); Plaintiff D was the heads of the defendant churches but was dismissed and removed from the church as shown below; G is a person who was appointed as the delegated pastor of the defendant church on October 2010 and was on the duty of the defendant church.

(No. 3-1, 2, and 1-2). (b)

Around March 2010, the defendant church organized the ice ice Committee consisting of the plaintiff D as the chairperson of the ice ice Council, the chairperson I, J, the representative K, and the plaintiff C who had had the house at the time as the ice member, and G submitted a resume to the ice ice Committee of the defendant church around that time.

After that, G was found to be a delegating pastor through a resolution of the joint council of September 26, 2010 of the Defendant church, and the Hoo's association passed a resolution of October 24, 201 approving the appointment of a delegating pastor as a delegating pastor of the Defendant church.

(No. 3-1, 2, and 1-1). (c)

On the other hand, while submitting a resume to the Defendant church ice ice Committee, G stated in the career part as “the time limit for voluntary activities after having taken place in the Covton region located in the Georgia on January 1, 1997 through March 3, 2010,” which read “the time limit for voluntary activities is included” in the part of the work experience as “the fact that the Plaintiff B and C obtained ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ices from the Defendant church with false work experience as above and obtained ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ice ices from the Defendant church’s delegate, and filed a resolution to nullify the invalidity of the general assembly's ice ice ice ice ice ice.”

(Evidence No. 3-1, 2, 1-4, 1-5).

As such, G enters the above period of time (from around March 2003 to March 2008) falsely and interferes with fair competition in the process of hearing.