logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.02 2015나2059878
임시당회결의무효확인
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) The defendant church is an E religious organization (integrated) (hereinafter referred to as “integrated religious organization”).

The General Assembly (hereinafter referred to as the “General Assembly”) shall be the highest member of the Assembly.

(2) Plaintiffs A, B, and C (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff A, etc.”) are the heads of the Defendant church, and Plaintiff D was the heads of the Defendant church, and was sentenced to a decision of dismissal from office to office or withdrawal from office from the country of the party branch of the Defendant church, and G is a person who was appointed as a delegated member of the Defendant church on October 2010 and was on duty.

B. Each judgment entered in the separate judgment list (hereinafter “each judgment of this case”) 1) The defendant church organized the ice ice Committee to hear the delegated pastor around March 2010, and G submitted a resume to the above ice Committee around that time.

After that, G filed a lawsuit on August 28, 2013 (Seoul Central District Court 2013No. 539797) against the Defendant church for the confirmation of invalidity of the instant ice ice ice ice ice ice ice, which was submitted by G to the Defendant church on August 29, 2010, and on September 26, 2010, G declared that the instant ice ice ice ice was invalid on the ground that the instant ice ice ice was substantially defective, and that the instant ice ice was invalid on July 24, 2014.

The defendant church is dissatisfied with this and filed an appeal (Seoul High Court 2014Na2029382), but the dismissal judgment was sentenced on June 4, 2015, but the defendant church is still pending in the final appeal as the defendant church re-appealed (Supreme Court 2015Da222746) and appealed (Supreme Court 2015Da22746). The defendant is a decision that approves the appointment of the entrusted pastor of the defendant church to G on October 24, 201.

arrow