1. As to the Intervenor’s 2,573,814,965 won and KRW 2,563,902,665, the Defendant shall start from September 15, 2017 to 2,565 won.

1. Determination as to each of the plaintiffs' claims

A. Although the Plaintiffs filed an application for withdrawal from a lawsuit on November 18, 2019, the Plaintiffs do not have the validity of withdrawal without the Defendant’s consent to the withdrawal.

B. The Plaintiffs seek payment of each of the instant transferee’s claims against the Defendant.

However, on July 23, 2019, the plaintiffs are the parties who transferred each of the claims for the transfer of the gold in this case to the plaintiff's intervenor. Thus, the defendant cannot seek the payment of each of the claims for the transfer of the gold in this case against the defendant. Thus, each of the claims by the plaintiffs is without merit.

2. Determination as to the claims of the Plaintiff’s Intervenor

A. The grounds for the attachment of the claim(s) to the indication of the claim(s) (However, as indicated in the grounds for the claim(s) and the grounds for the application for participation in the acquisition (s) to the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff,” “Defendant,” “Defendant,” “Defendant,” and the grounds for the application for participation in the acquisition (s).

(b) Articles 208 (3) 2 and 150 (3) of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment made by deeming the relevant provisions as private capital);

3. The plaintiff's motion to accept the plaintiff's motion is justified, and each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.