1. For the Intervenor:

A. The loan certificate prepared by the plaintiff A as of January 31, 2009 on the part of the plaintiff A 2.

The following facts shall be deemed to have been led by an intervenor who has taken over pursuant to the main sentence of Article 150(3) and the main sentence of Article 150(1

As of January 31, 2009, Plaintiff A prepared a certificate of borrowing KRW 20 million from the acquiring intervenor as of January 31, 2009, and Plaintiff B prepared a certificate of borrowing KRW 25 million from the acquiring intervenor around March 2009. All of these documents were made by the acquiring intervenor in arranging the above plaintiffs' commercial sex acts and the interest thereon at a high rate after the above plaintiffs were unable to pay.

Plaintiff

C Around March 2009, a letter of borrowing KRW 26 million was drawn up to the transferee and the transferee and the transferee and the transferee, which was drawn up by the coercion and intimidation of the transferee and the transferee, in the process of bringing the Plaintiff B, who was the above birth, to the commercial sex acts establishments.

The acceptance intervenor transferred all the claims under each of the above loans to the defendant.

The Defendant transferred each of the acquired bonds to the Intervenor, notified the transfer accordingly, and withdrawn from the lawsuit in this case, and the notification of transfer reached the Plaintiffs.

According to the above facts, the agreement pursuant to each loan instrument prepared by the plaintiffs to the acquiring intervenor is deemed to be an act that violates good morals and other social order. Thus, all of the claims against the plaintiffs by the acquiring intervenor are null and void pursuant to Article 103 of the Civil Code. Meanwhile, each claim against the plaintiffs against the acquiring intervenor was transferred to the defendant, and was transferred

Therefore, all obligations of the plaintiffs according to each loan instrument do not exist, and the plaintiffs have legal interest in seeking confirmation against the intervenor who is the creditor.

The plaintiffs' respective claims against the defendant are justified and accepted.