1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. The plaintiff's acceptance intervenor's lawsuit shall be dismissed.

4...

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statement in the evidence Nos. 3 through 6 (including branch numbers) of the Plaintiff and the Intervenor’s claim for loans, the Promotion Savings Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Promotion Savings Bank”) (hereinafter “Promotion Savings Bank”) has lent money to the Defendant around October 31, 2002, but failed to repay the money properly. The Defendant was declared bankrupt on February 20, 2006 in Seoul Central District Court Decision 2005Hau1542, declaration of bankruptcy in 15451, and exemption of 1541, the Defendant was declared bankrupt on May 29, 2006. The Defendant’s claim for loans against the Defendant of the Promotion Savings Bank was entered in the creditors’ list at the time of the above case. The Promotion Savings Bank’s claim for the above loans against the Plaintiff was transferred to the Intervenor on May 29, 2006, and thus, the Plaintiff’s claim for exemption of the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendant Savings Bank cannot be acknowledged as unlawful.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed, and the lawsuit of this case of the plaintiff's intervenor shall be dismissed. Since the judgment of the court of first instance on the plaintiff's claim is unfair with different conclusions, the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked and the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed, and the lawsuit of this case of the plaintiff's intervenor shall be dismissed,