beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
가. 2016. 5. 25. 범행 피고인은 2016. 5. 25. 13:30경 전주시 완산구 효자동에 있는 상호불상의 커피숍에서, B에게 “재무가 틀림없이 사적으로 돈을 다 써버려서 통장에 돈이 없기 때문에 통장을 학부모에게 공개하지 못한 것이다. 재무가 주부로서 너무 씀씀이가 크고 사치스러운 것을 보면 이는 틀림없는 사실이다”라고 말을 하였다.
However, victims C did not personally engage in membership fees with the finance of the Dmiddle School Parents Association.
The Defendant, by openly pointing out false facts as above, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.
B. On June 2016, the Defendant committed a crime to the first policeman on June 2016, to E: (a) the first policeman on June 2016.
It made a direct phone call to the same contents as the paragraph.
However, victims C did not personally engage in membership fees with the finance of the Dmiddle School Parents Association.
The Defendant, by openly pointing out false facts as above, thereby impairing the honor of the victim.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-compliance with an intention (Article 312 (2) of the Criminal Act);
B. Expression of intent that the victim does not want the punishment after the prosecution of this case
(b) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);