Defendants are not guilty. The summary of each judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

1. The Defendants are those who worked for the E company and were victims of the victim F’s accounting team.

G, the victim and the workplace partner, did not have any sonial relationship, and the defendants sent a written answer to the purport that they are the sonial death, and there was no other workplace fellows who paid such a written answer.

Defendant

A1) On the rooftop of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H building, the Defendant: (a) expressed to the head of the accounting team I at the latest during the spring 2012, that “G and F f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f f

B. Defendant B (1) around 13:00 on August 2012, at the accounting team office located on the 32th floor of the above H building, the Defendant expressed to K in charge of the civil petition affairs in the audit room “G and F, with the view to “G and F, f, and f, f, with the same drinking b., f.,” thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts. (2) On December 2012, 2012, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts to L, “F, M, and G c,” thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts.

2. An overview of evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case

A. Defendant A’s crime 1) The main evidence that seems to correspond to this part of the facts charged is as follows: ① Defendant A’s statement in the third protocol of trial is written by the witness F.