logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.03.18 2014고단3953
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 모욕 피고인은 2014. 12. 16. 23:50경 서울 송파구 위례성대로28길 임마뉴엘 교회 앞에서 택시 손님이 요금도 안주고 내리지 않는다는 택시기사 C의 신고를 받고 출동한 피해자 송파경찰서 D지구대 경위 E과 경장 F가 피고인에게 택시요금을 지불하고 귀가 할 것을 종용하자, C 및 지나가던 행인 3-4명이 지켜보는 가운데 “너희들은 빠져 씹새끼야, 지랄들 한다, 병신들 꺼져, 나중에 후회하지 말고, 지랄들한다, 씹새끼야, 우리 매형이 검사야, 너희들은 좆됐어 병신들아”라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자들을 모욕하였다.

2. The Defendant damaged public objects by: (a) the date and time as indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article; and (b) at the location of the D District E and F, arrested the Defendant as a crime of assault and insult; (c) resisting to the D Zone E and F, and resisting the fact that the Defendant was stopped at the D Zone; (d) 2 times away from the back of the driver’s seat of G 112 patrol, the back page of the driver’s seat of G 112 patrol, which was stopped at that place, thereby damaging the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to E, F, and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged by police vehicles;

1. Articles 311 and 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act among the crimes of insult;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties (such as the fact that a fine has been imposed for a crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the fact that it is against the punishment, the fact that the police officer has been punished, the fact that the police police officer has paid repair expenses, or

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. The part concerning dismissal of prosecution under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the confinement of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s summary of the facts charged is under the influence of liquor around December 16, 2014, the victim C (six-six years of age) in Samsung-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul.

arrow