The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is merely a simple emotional expression, and does not constitute an insulting expression that may damage the social evaluation of the victim's personal value, and the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act for the benefit of the occupants of apartment houses as a public interest, and the defendant mispersing that the above act was not a crime, and there was a justifiable ground for misunderstanding that it did not constitute a crime, and there was an error of law that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding of legal principles, which affected the conclusion

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the resident of the Nam-gu apartment unit B in Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, who is the NAVEN (C).

1) On December 18, 2018, the Defendant referred to as the members of the NAV on the NAV as the victim D on December 22:14, 2018, and posted a statement on the proposal, stating that “The 4,564,000 won used illegally if it appears as the result of the temporary meeting of the council of occupants’ representatives in December 25, 201, and the management rules that only used it as a custom such as the usage of the five operating expenses without accurate contents, and that it is not possible to agree on the personal proposal under the name of the resident, if you walk on the NA, if you walk on the NAV, it is necessary to think of the NAV, and even if we need to leave the NAVE as the representative, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim on December 26, 201.”

I want to talk about the long-term repair appropriations.

The details of the imposition of management expenses for the 11th month distributed to the occupants in the field of 10 items.