Main Issues
Standards for installation of special high-tension cables in urban areas, etc.
Summary of Judgment
According to Article 112 of the Decree on the Technical Standards for Electric Installations, unless the special high voltage processing cable is less than 170,00 V, and except in the case where the requirements of the proviso of paragraph (1) of the same Article and paragraph (2) of the same Article are met, electric wires other than cables can not be installed in the urban area and other areas where the authorization is concentrated. Therefore, it is defective for the Korea Electric Power Company to install the special high voltage processing cable of 22,905 in the urban area where the authorization is densely concentrated, with the electric voltage processing wire of 22,905, not the cable.
[Reference Provisions]
Article 36 of the Electric Utility Act, Article 112 of the Decree on the Standards for Electric Equipment Technology, Article 758 of the Civil Act
Plaintiff-Appellee
Plaintiff 1 and four others, attorneys Lee Jong-soo et al., Counsel for defendant-appellant
Defendant-Appellant
Attorney Jeong-chul et al., Counsel for the defendant
original decision
Daegu High Court Decision 78Na364 delivered on October 4, 1978
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal shall be borne by the defendant.
Reasons
The defendant's attorney's grounds of appeal are examined.
According to the judgment of the court below, since the non-party 1 was the director of the above 2nd floor slive building owned by the non-party 2 in Ulsan Metropolitan City, the court below's determination that the above slive cable is not likely to be used for the above slive cable, and the above slive cable's installation of the above slive cable at the slive line's 16th, 15:30 meters long, and the above slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's slive and slive line's slive line's slive line's slive line's s.
Therefore, this appeal is without merit, and therefore dismissed in accordance with the provisions of Articles 400, 395, and 384(1) of the Civil Procedure Act. The burden of litigation costs is governed by Articles 95 and 89 of the same Act, and is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges.
Justices Min Jae-chul (Presiding Justice)