1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff had been suffering from rehabilitation treatment by the Defendant while administering urology or cerebrovascular, etc.

B. On July 14, 2014, while the Plaintiff received physical treatment from the Defendant, the Plaintiff suffered 3 degrees of images on the left side of the Defendant’s employee, due to the negligence of B, who is an employee of the Defendant, and caused the aggravation of the previous disease due to its failure to receive proper rehabilitation treatment.

C. Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate for KRW 20,00,100, which is part of the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the tort in the above B, since he was negligent in not properly supervising and supervising the illegal acts in the employees B as an employer in the employees B.

2. The judgment reveals that the Plaintiff hospitalized the Defendant in order to receive treatment for both in-house and urology on the left side from May 27, 2014 to July 19, 2014; the Plaintiff’s request for treatment for out-of-the-counter surgery from the Defendant’s nurse training to the Plaintiff on July 14, 2014; the Plaintiff’s request for treatment of out-of-the-counter surgery from the Defendant’s nurse training to approximately 16:00 on the same day; the Defendant was aware that the Defendant visited the nurse at around 16:16:0 on the same day to the extent that the Plaintiff had no other evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff had been receiving treatment, such as the size of out-of-the-counter surgery; the Plaintiff had no other evidence to acknowledge that the Plaintiff had received treatment for the out-of-face therapy, such as the size of out-to-date surgery.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion that is premised on B's tort is without merit without having to examine the remainder of the issue.

3. Conclusion.