logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.23 2014나2001308
손해배상(의)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the following order for payment.

Reasons

Basic Facts

From around 194, the year 194, when the Plaintiff was born in 1971 and was under 23 years of age, the Plaintiff suffered from urology due to the urology on September 25, 2009, and was performing dysium and dysium surgery due to urology, and was dysium and dysium surgery since around that time, on February 21, 201, the Plaintiff complained of symptoms, such as dysium and right upper part, dysium, and dysium c (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by the Defendant.

As a result of the sports examination conducted against the Plaintiff, the doctor of the Defendant Hospital limited the Plaintiff’s revolving and left-hand revolving movement, and the radiation examination conducted a physical treatment to the Plaintiff until February 23, 201, when it was confirmed that the date and the opinion of escape from the compact No. 4-5 as a result of the CT photographing, and the opinion of escape from the compact No. 4-5 was confirmed.

On the other hand, the plaintiff notified the doctor of the defendant hospital of his spathic force, such as the above 1.

On February 23, 2011, the physical therapy of the Defendant Hospital provided physical therapy to the Plaintiff on the part of the Plaintiff on the side of both sides of the Plaintiff, in addition to the light and shoulder.

On February 24, 2011, the following day, the Plaintiff confirmed that both sprinks have occurred, and the two sprinks have been removed from the pharmacy, but the water house has become larger, and the doctor knew the above fact to the doctor on February 25, 2011. Accordingly, the doctor of the Defendant hospital confirmed that two sprinks have occurred from both sprinks, etc. of the Plaintiff, and the doctor of the Defendant hospital continued disinfection and sprinking on the video side on February 26, 201 and February 28, 2011.

On March 2, 2011, the doctor of the Defendant Hospital set a large number of images, such as the Plaintiff’s right light, but at the left side of the video, the doctor’s opinion of titivity was confirmed in the video section, such as the left side, and upon the confirmation of the opinion of titos dot 2nd dere Rt, 2-3nd Dourn (Lt) you request the hospital to treat.

The plaintiff is prepared with a written request for medical treatment, stating kidney pansty patients.

arrow