logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.12 2015가합1515
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant D’s KRW 65,193,98 for the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from December 6, 2012 to November 12, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff as a party is a corporation with the purpose of financial business, etc. having its place of business in Busan Seo-gu. The Defendants were both the Plaintiff’s current or former employees, and Defendant B was the chief director, Defendant C, Defendant D, E, and F at the time of the loan on December 6, 2012 by I and J (hereinafter “instant loan”).

B. (1) On November 24, 2012, I (hereinafter “instant real estate”) owned by K around November 24, 201, Busan Shipping Daegu L Apartment 101 Dong 101 (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B) Around December 6, 2012, J purchased KRW 162,00,000,000 as the condition of accepting the said apartment, and again drafted a false sales contract as if it re-sales it to J. (2) around December 6, 2012, J received the details of the transfer household inspection of the said apartment at the Busan Shipping Daegu Ndong Office, Busan, and delivered it to I, and I, around that time, entered the part of the tenant in the details of the transfer household inspection into the MW in order to make the said apartment as if there was no tenant in the said apartment.

As a result, I and J have forged one copy of the contents of the transfer household, which is a public document, for the purpose of exercising it in collusion.

3) Around December 6, 2012, J submitted to the employee in charge of the loan and exercised the details of the transfer household which is a forged public document by submitting the forged details as if they were issued genuinely. 4) On December 6, 2012, J received a loan from the above A community credit cooperatives as security, and submitted the above details of the transfer household inspection and the false sales contract (the seller I and the buyerJ) to believe that it is true, and received KRW 125 million from the above loan employee in charge of the loan.

As a result, I and J shall induce the plaintiff in collusion.

arrow