(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고단2903

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.11.20 2014고단2903

공문서위조등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant conspired with C and D in sequence, and C purchased apartment in small amount on the condition of accepting the obligation of the deposit for the lease on a deposit basis, and C and D agree with the name of the lender who will be the holder of the ownership transfer registration of the above apartment, and C and D agree with C and D, as if there was no tenant, forged the content of the transfer household inspection and deliver it to the above lender, and the Defendant, C and D decided to obtain the loan by obtaining the apartment loan from the financial institution by requiring the above lender to submit the content of the transfer household inspection as above at the time of filing the loan application as if the genuine purchaser of the above apartment.

1. On September 4, 2007, the Defendant conspired with D and C to consecutive order, and around September 4, 2007, the Defendant: (a) entered the name of the borrower E into the Bupyeong-dong Office located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, Seo-gu, Gwangju, by allowing D, C to obtain the details of inspection of the transferred household, entered as the resident G, and then delivered them to D, C; (b) D, C, by using computers for the purpose of exercising the aforementioned contents of inspection of the relocated household at a place where the location of Gwangju is unknown at that time, referring to the contents of inspection of the relocated household at that time; (c) “Administrative agency: Pyeong-dong, Seo-gu, Seoul; (d) 11:33 September 4, 2007; and (e) 102-203, 2007, 2007, 094, resident E; and (d) made it out from that time to September 28, 2008.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C and D, forged official documents for the purpose of uttering.

2. The Defendant’s uttering of forged official document shall be in sequence D and C.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2013.07.12 2013고단1463

-부산지방법원 2015.11.12 2015고단684

-대구지방법원 2013.05.02 2013고단1465

-부산지방법원 2015.11.12 2015가합1515

-창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.11.27 2015고단992