logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.11.12 2015고단684
공문서위조등
Text

Defendant

N, M, and P shall be sentenced to 6 months of imprisonment, and 6 months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes of subparagraphs A, 1, 2, and 3 of the Decision.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 2, 2013, "2015 Highest 684" (Defendant N, M, A) Defendant M, and A were sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten years for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act in the Busan District Court Act, etc., and the judgment was finalized on October 15, 2013.

The Defendants purchased apartment houses with tenants on the condition of acquiring the lease deposit, and conspired to forge the details of the transfer household inspection, and to deception the loan by deceiving financial institutions as if they were provided apartment houses without tenants as security by submitting forged documents to the financial institutions.

1. On February 1, 2013, the Defendants purchased Nos. 311 and 2204 of the Busan-gu Y apartment house 311 and 2204 in the name of Defendant N, and Defendant N issued the details of the occupancy household inspection of the above apartment at the Zdong office of Busan-gu on February 21, 2013 and delivered them to Defendant A, Defendant A and Defendant M on the same day. Defendant A and Defendant M entered the part of the tenant on the details of the occupancy household inspection to keep the apartment as if there was no tenant in the above apartment, and copied it after attaching Defendant N’s name on that place.

As a result, the Defendants forged the content of the transfer household, which is an official document, for the purpose of uttering in collusion.

2. Around February 21, 2013, the Defendants submitted the forged details of the transfer household inspection to A at the point of the Nam-gu Busan Nam-dong, Busan, as described in paragraph 1, as if they were actually issued.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to use the forged public document's content for perusal.

3. The Defendants were making an application for a loan to the said apartment as security at the time, place, and the said apartment as described in paragraph (2) and the said apartment was paid a deposit of KRW 125 million from January 24, 201 to the said apartment.

arrow