Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

Defendant No. 1 of the seized evidence.

Punishment of the crime

On August 13, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. by the Seoul Western District Court, and on October 10, 2016, Defendant A completed the execution of the sentence by the U.S. Eup prison.

Defendant

B On May 28, 2015, the Seoul Eastern District Court sentenced one year to imprisonment with prison labor for night-time structure intrusion theft, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on April 6, 2016, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Jung Eup prison.

On April 2017, Defendants 2017, 2017, Defendant A conspired to commit fraud by posting a letter of sale of used goods on the Internet NAVand High National Cafs, etc. and communicating with buyers; Defendant B conspireded to commit fraud by taking charge of withdrawing the price of goods deposited into the account of the National Bank Account in the name of Defendant A.

On April 28, 2017, the Defendants conspired to publish a letter on “Maz 2285” on the Internet NAV Kaba,” and then sent the price for the goods to the victim G who contacted, thereby delivering the goods to the victim G.

The term "" refers to the following.

However, the Defendants did not have the intent or ability to deliver the goods as promised even if they received the payment from the above victims.

In collusion, the Defendants: (a) received KRW 550,00 from 25 victims, as shown in the separate crime list, a sum of KRW 10,510,00,00 from 25 times from around that time to June 25, 2017, by deceiving the said victim as such; (b) received KRW 550,00 from the said victim to the national bank account in the name of the national bank account in the name of the said victim on April 28, 2017.

On April 2017, Defendants 2017, 2017, Defendant A conspired to commit fraud by posting an article on the sales of used goods on the Internet NAVand High National Cafs, etc. and communicating with buyers, and Defendant B conspired to commit fraud by taking charge of withdrawing the amount of goods deposited into the account of the National Bank Account in the name of Defendant A.

Defendants as above.