beta
Text
1. The Defendant is either KRW 2,764,051 and the Plaintiff’s forest land of KRW 8,840 square meters from February 3, 2016.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On February 27, 2012, the instant forest was owned by the Defendant. On September 16, 2013, the Plaintiff completed the registration of ownership transfer on September 16, 2013 by winning the instant forest land at a successful bid.
B. Among the forest land in the instant case, the portion 1, 2, 5, 6, and 1 of the attached drawing in order to connect each point of 68 square meters in part 1, 2, 5, 6, and 2 of the attached drawing and each point of 2, 3, 4, 5, and 2 of the same drawing and each point of 7, 8, 9, 10, and 7 of the same drawing and 46 square meters in order to connect each point of 8 square meters in part 8, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 11 of the same drawing and each point of 49 square meters in order to connect each point of 11 square meters in part 5, 16, 22, 23, 24, and 15 of the same drawing are installed in each of the instant grave sites (hereinafter referred to as “the grave site”).
Each of the instant graves is the Defendant’s parents, grandparents, and grandparents’ parents. As such, the Defendant, a son, presides over his religious history and manages each of the instant graves, occupied the site of the instant graves while protecting and managing them, and has the form by which the existence of each of the instant graves can be recognized from outside, such as drums, etc.
C. The amount equivalent to the rent from September 16, 2013 to February 2, 2016 on each of the instant sites where each of the instant graves is installed is KRW 2,764,051, and the amount equivalent to the rent for the following month is KRW 84,407.
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 19 (including a tentative number), the result of the on-site inspection by this court, the result of the appraiser E's survey and appraisal, the result of the appraiser F's appraisal of rent, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Determination
A. According to the fact that the Plaintiff’s excavation of each of the instant graves and the claim for extradition on each of the instant lands was accepted, the Defendant shall, barring any special circumstances, do so.