beta
Text
The judgment below
The part against the defendant shall be reversed.
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal does not have any act of disturbance, such as abusiveism, on the aircraft, and thus, the judgment of the court below which convicted the defendant is erroneous, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
Even if the facts charged in the instant case are recognized, the lower court’s punishment (fine 700,000) is too unreasonable.
2. Summary of the facts charged and the judgment of the court below
(a) No passenger on the airplane of the facts charged against the defendant shall engage in any disturbing conduct, such as verbal abuse, loud singing, etc. on the airplane in flight, notwithstanding the captain's prior warning;
Defendant
On October 13, 2013, 17:10 on October 13, 2013, the Co-Defendant B of the lower court: (a) boarded at the port of supply of Kim Sea station located in the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Busan, and (b) requested crew members to have a seat seat next to an emergency exit, but he was refused, but he did not fasten the seat belt during flight; and (c) received several demands from other female crew members to carry the seat belt from crew members, but he did not cause any disturbance on the part of crew members; (d) the crew “Whhh,” and the crew “Wh, if you have come to wear the seat belt,” and the Defendant did not go through the disturbance of the above B, and the Defendant stated that “service would be able to carry out a large interest with the desire to do so.”
Defendant
In addition, even though the above action was given a prior warning from FF to the crew of the captain who was delegated with authority by the captain due to the above action, the Defendant continued to take a large amount of care, such as “service is able to file an accusation against enteb network,” along with the bath theory, and Defendant B also took a bath.
As a result, the defendant and the above B conspiredd about 5 to 10 minutes to bring a disturbance.
B. In full view of the following circumstances, the lower court determined that the Defendant stated the facts charged on the aircraft in flight.