Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for two years and for six months, respectively.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Criminal facts

And Facts constituting the cause of the attachment order / [crime]

1. Quasi-voluntary indecent act (2013 Gohap 348) Defendant and Defendant A (hereinafter “Defendant A”) requested to attach an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant A”) around 02:00 on September 26, 2013, the victim F (24 years) was locked in E and the surface of the water located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, used in E and the surface of the water in order to force the victim to commit an indecent act, thereby raising his/her bridge on the part of the victim, leading the victim to the right side of the victim, and making him/her thymbling with the victim’s chest.

As a result, Defendant A committed an indecent act on the part of the victim by using the victim’s non-refluence status.

2. Fraud, fabrication of private documents, uttering of a falsified document, forgery of a private signature, forgery of a signature on a criminal investigation, violation of resident registration law (2015 Gohap 349);

A. On September 22, 2015, Defendant A was boarding a taxi operated by the victim G in front of the Korean bank that was located in the 301st through through through a Tong-gu 301 on September 22, 2015, and subsequently, Defendant A was able to pay the taxi fare even though there is no intent or ability to pay the taxi fee, and Defendant A again obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount by failing to pay a total of KRW 78,400 for the studio complex in the studio-dong and the studio-dong in the studio-dong and the studio-dong in the studio-dong at the time of Tong-gu.

B. On September 22, 2015, Defendant A, at around 02:40 on September 22, 2015, arrested a flagrant offender in the instant case at the Dong-gu Police Station I box located in H at the time of Tong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, and the instant investigation document, stating “K” in the column for “the confirmation” out of the certificate of arrest of flagrant offender who was prepared by the slopeJ affiliated with the said patrol unit, affixed the Defendant’s seal on his name and then submitted it to the saidJ as if the said certificate was duly written.

Defendant

A, for the purpose of exercising its authority, forged a letter of confirmation of arrest of flagrant offenders including the part of the private document in the K's name on fact-finding without authority, and exercised it.

(c)

of this title. The signature forgery, the above-mentioned signature, and the