beta
Text
1. The lawsuit against the Defendants shall be dismissed by the Plaintiff New Farming Cooperatives.
2. The forests and fields U.S. 64,165 square meters; and
Reasons
In fact, comprehensively taking account of the fact-finding results with respect to Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, V-Myeon offices, W-Myeon offices, and X-Eup offices, the plaintiff succeeding to the plaintiff (appointed party), the designated parties, and the defendants (hereinafter "joint owners of this case") share the share ratio of the pertinent parties in the attached Form No. 1 of the co-ownership shares as of the date of the closure of the argument in this case, and the fact that the co-owners of this case did not reach an agreement on the division of the land in this case among the co-owners of this case.
Plaintiff
This part of the lawsuit is examined ex officio as to the legitimacy of the lawsuit against the defendants of the new farming association corporation.
In full view of the purport of the entire arguments as seen earlier, it is recognized that the Plaintiff Breeding Incorporated Co., Ltd. completed the registration of ownership transfer based on each sales contract as to the share of 2/14 of the instant land on December 8, 2015, based on the Plaintiff’s successor to the shares in the attached Table, and the Appointed Co., Ltd.’s co-owner of the instant land. Thus, the Plaintiff Breeding Co., Ltd. cannot be seen as
Therefore, the lawsuit of this case against the Defendants of the Plaintiff Breeding Incorporated Association is unlawful as being brought by a person who is not a party.
[The Plaintiff’s Intervenor (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties succeeded to all the co-ownership shares of Plaintiff Y, but the Defendants did not expressly agree to the withdrawal of the lawsuit against Plaintiff YY, and thus, Plaintiff YY still remains as the Plaintiff of the instant lawsuit. Division of the legal doctrine on the cause of the claim is possible at will if the agreement is reached between co-owners, but if the co-ownership is divided by trial due to the failure to reach agreement, the court may choose the method of division.