logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.05 2018가단1846
공유물분할
Text

1. Auction of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 and the remaining money after deducting the cost of auction from the proceeds of sale;

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the designated parties, and the Defendants shared the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) for each co-ownership share listed in the separate sheet No. 2.

(C) On February 2, 200, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and Defendant C, E, and F were present at the first date of pleading of this case, and there was no objection to divide the instant real estate, and the parties did not reach an agreement on the method of partition before the date of adjudication of this case, they decided to divide the instant real estate by auction, such as the Plaintiff (Appointed Party)’s request.

Defendant D did not submit a written answer to this Court.

Before this ruling was rendered, there was no agreement between the parties on the method of partition.

3. Accordingly, all of the claims by the plaintiffs (appointed parties) shall be accepted.

arrow