logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.03.22 2014가합12141
손해배상 등
Text

1. The defendant is each of the plaintiffs, plaintiffs (appointed parties) as stated in the "Personal Fee List" in attached Table 4.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs, the plaintiffs (Appointeds), the plaintiff and the succeeding intervenors, the plaintiff and the succeeding intervenors, the plaintiff's succeeding intervenors and the designated intervenors (hereinafter referred to as "the plaintiff, the plaintiff (Appointeds), the plaintiff and the succeeding intervenors, the plaintiff's succeeding intervenors, the plaintiff's succeeding intervenors, the plaintiff's succeeding intervenors, and the designated intervenors together) are the building AM ground (NM facilities, business facilities, urban residential housing, one Dong 238 households), Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as "the building of this case").

(B) The building of this case was approved for use on September 27, 2012 and was delivered to the buyer around that time. The building of this case was delivered to the buyer.

2) The building of this case did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing (approval for Use), defects such as rupture, water leakage, and rupture were caused to the section for common use and the section for exclusive use due to defective construction, or errors such as alteration of design drawing and construction differently from design drawing. Accordingly, the function of the building of this case was hindered, aesthetic or stability. Accordingly, the Plaintiff, etc., who is the sectional owner of the building of this case, requested repair of defects. C. The total sum of the whole area of the whole household of the building of this case, such as the whole area of the building of this case, was 4,896 square meters, and the whole area of each household owned by the Plaintiff, etc., who is the sectional owner of the building of this case, among the 238 households of this case, is the same as the "area column" in attached Form 4. [Grounds for recognition], there is no dispute over each entry in attached Table 3 and 21.

2. Claims for damages due to default;

A. The summary of the assertion 1 is the package of the news report among the defective items requested for appraisal regarding the building of this case.

arrow