logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.06.18 2019고단524
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving cars;

The Defendant, at around 17:45 on October 29, 2018, drives the said car with a strong distance, unbrush, and unbundledly and unbundledly, while normal operation is difficult due to the following: (a) around 17:45, the Defendant, at around 29, is driving the said car along the right-hand side of Yongsan-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along the 34-ro 29-gil, the Defendant is driving on two-lanes from the jurisdiction of the Guluri-ri, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

The stop has repeatedly been stopped and proceeds at an unsound speed.

In such cases, the driver of the vehicle is likely to cause an accident in the situation where normal driving is difficult due to influence of alcohol, so the driver of the vehicle is prohibited from driving the vehicle, and there was a duty of care to prevent the accident by accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently driven a vehicle in a situation where normal driving is difficult due to the influence of alcohol as above, and the police officer dispatched close to the Defendant’s vehicle by making a 112 report, stating warning lights, disregarding the warning lights and stopping by several warning broadcasts, and led to the Defendant’s failure to enter the vehicle in which the Defendant was driving and driving the vehicle, followed the CA-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wn-Wing vehicle, which the Defendant continued to drive the vehicle in the front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered damages to the victim D (the 30-year old), who is the driver of the patrol vehicle, due to the above occupational negligence, such as catum satums, requiring a stability rate for about two weeks, and the victim E (the 44-year old) who is the seat of the patrol vehicle, due to the catum satums, requiring a stability rate for about two weeks.

2. On August 29, 2018, the Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement) contact with the “vehicle” under the preceding paragraph on August 17, 2018.

arrow