logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2017.04.28 2017고정3
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

1. The sentence against the accused shall be 50,000 won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who sells agricultural products with the trade name of "C" from Gyeongbuk-gun B and substantially manages and operates an enterprise.

No one shall place a false mark of origin or make an indication likely to cause confusion as such.

Nevertheless, on September 22, 2016, the Defendant indicated the origin of the Defendant on the C website, which he/she purchased from the Gyeongjin-gun Forestry Cooperatives of Chungcheongnam-do in the Gyeongjin-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, 2016, marked the origin of the Defendant as a finite five.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A corrective order, evidence of violation of origin, copy of the business registration certificate, the successful bid of the dispatching mushroom, details of sale on the vegetable Internet, and certificates of self-education on agricultural products originating;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 14 of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products and Articles 6 (1) 1 of the Act on the Selection of Origin of Agricultural and Fishery Products (excluding punishment) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the instant crime under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act include the following: (a) the background, method, result, Defendant’s attitude, age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances after committing the instant crime; and (b) the punishment as set forth in the text is determined by taking into account all the circumstances indicated in the arguments

arrow