1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 34,698,694 won and 5% per annum from September 23, 2009 to May 11, 2016.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant C, as a medical specialist in static surgery, is a doctor who, on September 23, 2009, performed the right-free marosis correction malone (hereinafter “instant surgery”) with the Plaintiff (D students and women) and the Defendant Korean Medical Association is an insurer who entered into a mutual aid agreement with Defendant C.

B. In the course of the instant surgery on September 23, 2009, Defendant C excessively reconciled the part of the part of the part of the part of the Plaintiff’s 1st head of the pelle, and thereby, Defendant C damaged the upper synthesis of the part of the part of the 1st head of the pelle.

According to the above commercial synthesis damage, there was a post-explication, such as the change of the garment of the 1st century, the math of the math of the math of the math of the mathy, the math of the math of

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute; Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4; Eul evidence Nos. 1 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply); the result of the court's entrustment of medical records to the director of Seoul Medical Center; the result of the court's fact inquiry about Seoul Medical Center; the purport of the whole arguments;

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. As seen earlier, Defendant C is liable for damages caused by the Plaintiff’s negligence in the course of the instant surgery, since the negligence of the Plaintiff’s protruding in the part on the side of the 1st head of the pelle is recognized in excess of the part on the part on the part of the Plaintiff during the instant surgery, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the said medical negligence. However, in light of the purport of the damage compensation system, the motive for Defendant C to perform the instant surgery is to treat the Plaintiff’sless balpus, as it is for the treatment of the Plaintiff’sless balpus, by the Plaintiff’s consent, the degree of negligence in the instant surgery, the degree of the Plaintiff’s right-hand side of the Plaintiff before and after the instant surgery, and the progress of the instant surgery, etc., it is reasonable to limit the Defendants’ liability to 70% in view of the purport of the damage compensation system that is fair allocation

B. 1) The scope of damages is against the president of the Seoul Medical Center of this Court.