1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 2006, the Plaintiff was under the surgery on both sides in B around December 2006, and thereafter, the Plaintiff continued to have the pains on the left-hand side, and around 2010, the pains on both sides were considerably serious.

Around that time, according to the radiation opinion of the Plaintiff at the Incheon National University, Seoul National Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) affiliated with the Defendant, the left-hand edge of the Plaintiff was 16 degrees 16 degrees 2 and 40 degrees 40 degrees 16 degrees 2 and 3 level 1 degree 2 and 3 level 1 level 2 and 3 level 1 degree 1 degree 1.

B. Accordingly, on April 28, 201, the Plaintiff received an operation to remove a double sloping K-V on the left side inserted by the Defendant Hospital at the time of the instant operation (hereinafter “instant operation”). On June 8, 201, the Plaintiff received an operation to remove a double sloping K-V on the left side of 3 and 5. On July 5, 201, the Plaintiff received an operation to remove a double sloping K-V on the left side of 1, 2, 3, and 5, which was inserted at the time of the instant operation.

C. However, after the instant surgery, there were problems, such as the Plaintiff’s 30 minutes to 1 hour off the left-hand 2 strings below the upper left-hand 1, 2, and 3 strings below the upper left-hand 1, 3 strings on the left-hand 1, 2, and 3 strings on the left-hand 1, 201, and the Plaintiff was provided medical treatment and examination at the Defendant hospital several times during the period from November 7, 201 to August 22, 2012. As a result of X-ray inspection, there was a 1, 2nd strings on the left-hand 1, 3nd strings on the left-hand 2, and the 1st strings were

Then, on October 11, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “a modification after the scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarcity scarke,” and on November 21, 2013 at the above hospital, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as “a correction of scarcity scarcitys” and “along-term extension of scarcity scarcity scarcitys”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, Gap evidence 10-1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Defendant hospital performed the instant surgery is medical treatment.